Opinion: It's not just housing

Opinion: It's not just housing

0 개 1,958 노영례

 Creating strong communities needs to be at centre of debate on Auckland's future

d44faeb718178ae7bcdac9d520b9f3c0_1462354846_8801.jpg

An Auckland University urban planning expert says we need to think about more than just housing when considering Auckland's future.

Dr Lee Beattie, Deputy Head of School: Urban Planning and Design, University of Auckland

It is concerning to observe that the recent and ongoing public debate about Auckland’s future direction seems to be framed around short-run housing supply and affordability issues, with the overly simplistic suggestions that more residentially zoned land at the city’s edge will somehow solve Auckland’s growth issues.

In my view, this is fundamentally flawed and fails to acknowledge the long-term implications of this short-term thinking. 

Providing housing at the edge, with the nearest employment opportunities located a long drive away, with shops and other services still a reasonable drive away, is not affordable housing in any shape or form, when you think about the long-run costs associated with these type of housing choices. 

Think about the cost of travel (let alone the loss of productivity and personal time you could be spending with family and friends) and the fact that you cannot survive in these areas without a car. Who is going to pay for, and maintain, all the new infrastructure required for these housing options, when we know the cost of this is not currently being covered by the users?

Debate needs to be about more than just affordability   

As a result, I would argue that the debate around growth needs to be much more encompassing and shouldn’t just be dominated by housing affordability issues – although this is, of course, a critical element. It is about the future urban form Aucklanders want for their city and for their children to inherit. 

This debate should be about the wider urban planning and design picture, addressing employment options, reducing travel demand, providing a range of travel choices, the quality of the public realm, the quality and design of our buildings, the provision of open space, shopping and entertainment, and protection of our reserves and coastal areas. That is, it should be about building and creating safe, strong and resilient communities that we can all enjoy and actively contribute to. 

The importance of liveable communities 

It’s not surprising that some of Auckland’s most liveable suburbs are located close to employment, shopping and entertainment opportunities, with established and frequent public transport options. Residents of these suburbs can enjoy these opportunities without enduring travel for long distances. They have the ability to walk to their local shops and services and interact with their neighbours. Their children can play with each other in their local parks, developing a strong sense of community and place. Shouldn’t we be developing more areas like these, as opposed to creating dislocated residential subdivision?

We need to consider the liveability of the neighbourhoods we are creating, not solely the affordability.

In my view, while the issue of affordability is rightly prominent, simply concentrating on housing in this way will not address Auckland’s housing issues. Nor will it enable the development of successful communities in the long run.

Balanced approach needed 

When we consider the issue of affordability, it's also interesting to note how people’s expectations towards housing have changed. My parents' first house was 90m2 – this was all they could afford, and with a second mortgage at interest rates much higher than today. 

Now the average house is over 200m2, with an expectation that this should be your first house. This expectation – rightly or wrongly – has had significant impacts on the cost of housing.

We need to take a balanced approach that provides for a range of housing options in appropriate locations where we can leverage off the existing infrastructure and local services with a choice of well-designed housing and associated services. This will reduce infrastructure cost and travel demand, increase the vitality of existing town centres, provide a range of housing options for all our residents and provide for future urban growth. 

Creating a sense of community

How do we create a strong sense of community and place, in areas flagged for future growth, whether in existing town centres or newly developing areas of the wider city? This should be an overarching consideration and drive public discussion about Auckland’s future.

We all need to engage in what scale and form we want Auckland to have over the long term and, just as importantly, how we are going to pay for it. Unfortunately, infrastructure costs (including ongoing maintenance) are not at the forefront of many Aucklanders’ minds, except when the council’s rates bills arrive in our letterboxes. What we can afford, what we are willing to pay for, and how these costs will be shared between the community and future generations are vital questions that must also form part of this debate.  


4 cases of COVID-19 with unknown source, 11 A…

댓글 0 | 조회 2,738 | 2020.08.12
The Prime Minister has an… 더보기

1 new case of COVID-19, 11 August

댓글 0 | 조회 2,275 | 2020.08.12
There is one new case of … 더보기

National releases 2020 Party List

댓글 0 | 조회 1,306 | 2020.08.08
National’s 2020 Party Lis… 더보기

10 ways to say goodbye to plastics

댓글 0 | 조회 1,498 | 2020.08.08
Plastic Free July may hav… 더보기

Wellington builder sentenced for black market…

댓글 0 | 조회 1,123 | 2020.08.07
A Wellington builder has … 더보기

Economic alarm bells ring

댓글 0 | 조회 1,089 | 2020.08.07
Recently released unemplo… 더보기

New skatepark opens in Glenfield

댓글 0 | 조회 1,426 | 2020.08.07
Continued investment by K… 더보기

Supermarket "specials" risk misleading shoppe…

댓글 0 | 조회 1,222 | 2020.08.05
Consumer NZ'slatest super… 더보기

How to plant smarter by planning your plantin…

댓글 0 | 조회 1,014 | 2020.08.04
Winter is the time to get… 더보기

Go with Tourism to launch industry expert web…

댓글 0 | 조회 1,100 | 2020.08.04
Go with Tourism, a govern… 더보기

Building a resilient city

댓글 0 | 조회 1,184 | 2020.08.03
Running the length of Qua… 더보기

Much loved Spraggs Bush track reopens

댓글 0 | 조회 1,109 | 2020.07.31
The much-loved Spraggs Bu… 더보기

Auckland experts changing the face of cyber s…

댓글 0 | 조회 1,148 | 2020.07.29
Some of the world’s leadi… 더보기

Save the Children urges businesses to take th…

댓글 0 | 조회 1,105 | 2020.07.28
Today’s guilty plea in th… 더보기

Auckland Council economic initiative helps se…

댓글 0 | 조회 1,350 | 2020.07.26
An Auckland Council progr… 더보기

Recall to manage Listeria risk – Product List

댓글 0 | 조회 1,362 | 2020.07.25
A range of cheese product… 더보기

New public spaces in Auckland’s city centre c…

댓글 0 | 조회 1,277 | 2020.07.24
Auckland city centre’s re… 더보기

Company fined $10,000 for selling 'pink' minc…

댓글 0 | 조회 1,376 | 2020.07.23
An Auckland company was s… 더보기

Funeral insurance overpriced and overhyped

댓글 0 | 조회 1,032 | 2020.07.23
Overpriced funeral insura… 더보기

Integrated fares launching for ferries

댓글 0 | 조회 1,091 | 2020.07.23
Ferry customers will soon… 더보기

Old tyres cost illegal dumper $860 in court

댓글 0 | 조회 1,388 | 2020.07.21
A man who illegally dumpe… 더보기

New Auckland Council Chief Executive appointe…

댓글 0 | 조회 1,303 | 2020.07.17
Jim Stabback to join coun… 더보기

Auckland Council endorses Mayor Phil Goff’s E…

댓글 0 | 조회 1,354 | 2020.07.16
Auckland Council’s Financ… 더보기

Nikki Kaye to retire from politics at 2020 el…

댓글 0 | 조회 1,118 | 2020.07.16
Nikki Kaye, MP for Auckla… 더보기

Cash investors may have started to ‘bargain h…

댓글 0 | 조회 1,335 | 2020.07.15
On our quarterly index, w… 더보기